Shell script
A shell script is a script written for the shell, or command line interpreter, of an operating system. It is often considered a simple domain-specific programming language. Typical operations performed by shell scripts include file manipulation, program execution, and printing text.
Many shell script interpreters double as command line interface, such as the various Unix shells, Windows PowerShell or the MS-DOS COMMAND.COM. Others, such as AppleScript or the graphical Windows Script Host (WScript.exe), add scripting capability to computing environments without requiring a command line interface. Other examples of programming languages primarily intended for shell scripting include DCL and JCL.
Capabilities
Shortcuts
In their most basic form, a shell script can provide a convenient variation of a system command where special environment settings, command options, or postprocessing is applied automatically, but in a way that allows the new script to still act as a fully normal Unix command.
One example would be to create a version of ls, the command to list files, giving it a shorter command name of l, which would be normal saved in a user's bin directory as /home/username/bin/l, and a default set of command options pre-supplied.
#!/bin/sh
LC_COLLATE=C ls -FCas "$@"Here, The first line indicates what interpreter should be used to execute the rest of the script, and the second line makes a listing with options for file format indicators, columns, all files (none omitted), and a size in blocks. The LC_COLLATE=C set the default collation order to not fold upper and lower case together, and the "$@" causes any parameters given to l to be passed through as parameters to ls, so that all of the normal options and other syntax known to ls can still be used.
The user would then be able to simply use l for the most commonly used short listing.
Batch jobs
Shell scripts allow several commands that would be entered manually at a command line interface to be executed automatically, and without having to wait for a user to trigger each stage of the sequence. For example, in a directory with three C source code files, rather than manually running the four commands required to build the final program from them, one could instead create a C shell script, here named build and kept in the directory with them, which would compile them automatically:
#!/bin/csh
echo compiling...
cc -c foo.c
cc -c bar.c
cc -c qux.c
cc -o myprog foo.o bar.o qux.o
echo done.The script would allow a user to save the file being edited, pause the editor, and then just run ./build to create the updated program, test it, and then return to the editor. Since the 1980s or so, however, scripts of this type have been replaced with utilities like make which are specialized for building programs.
Generalization
Simple batch jobs are not unusual for isolated tasks, but using shell loops, tests, and variables provides much more flexibility to users. A Bourne-Again shell script to convert JPEG images to PNG images, where the image names are provided on the command line - possibly via wildcards - instead of each being listed within the script, can be created with this file, typically saved in a file like /home/username/bin/jpg2png
#!/bin/bash
for jpg in "$@" ; do # use $jpg in place of each filename given, in turn
png=$(echo "$jpg" | sed 's/jpg$/png/') # find the PNG version of the filename by replacing .jpg with .png
echo converting "$jpg" ... # output status info to the user running the script
if convert "$jpg" jpg.to.png ; then # use the convert program (common in Linux) to create the PNG in a temp file
mv jpg.to.png "$png" # if it worked, rename the temporary PNG image to the correct name
else # ...otherwise complain and exit from the script
echo 'error: failed output saved in "jpg.to.png".' 1>&2
exit 1
fi # the end of the "if" test construct
done # the end of the "for" loop
echo all conversions successful # tell the user the good newsThe jpg2png command can then be run on an entire directory full of JPEG images with just jpg2png *.jpg
Verisimilitude
A key feature of shell scripts is that the invocation of their interpreters are handled as a core operating system feature. So rather than a user's shell only being able to execute scripts in that shell's language, or a script only having its interpreter directive handled correctly if it was run from a shell (both of which were limitations in the early Bourne shell's handling of scripts), shell scripts are setup and executed by the OS itself. A modern shell script is not just on the same footing as system commands, but rather many system commands are actually shell scripts (or more generally, scripts, since some of them are not interpreted by a shell, but instead by Perl, Python, or some other language). This extends to returning exit codes like other system utilities to indicate success or failure, and allows them to be called as components of larger programs regardless of how those larger tools are implemented.
Like standard system commands, shell scripts classically omit any kind of filename extension unless intended to be read into a running shell through a special mechanism for this purpose (such as sh's ".", or csh's source).
Programming
Many modern shells also supply various features usually found only in more sophisticated general-purpose programming languages, such as control-flow constructs, variables, comments, arrays, subroutines, and so on. With these sorts of features available, it is possible to write reasonably sophisticated applications as shell scripts. However, they are still limited by the fact that most shell languages have little or no support for data typing systems, classes, threading, complex math, and other common full language features, and are also generally much slower than compiled code or interpreted languages written with speed as a performance goal.
Other scripting languages
Many powerful scripting languages have been introduced for tasks that are too large or complex to be comfortably handled with ordinary shell scripts, but for which the advantages of a script are desirable and the development overhead of a full-blown, compiled programming language would be disadvantageous. The specifics of what separates scripting languages from high-level programming languages is a frequent source of debate. But generally speaking a scripting language is one which requires an interpreter.
Life Cycle
Shell scripts often serve as an initial stage in software development, and are often subject to conversion later to a different underlying implementation, most commonly being converted to Perl, Python, or C. The interpreter directive allows the implementation detail to be fully hidden inside the script, rather than being exposed as a filename extension, and provides for seamless reimplementation in different languages with no impact on end users.
Advantages and disadvantages
Often, writing a shell script is much quicker than writing the equivalent code in other programming languages. The many advantages include easy program or file selection, quick start, and interactive debugging. A shell script can be used to provide a sequencing and decision-making linkage around existing programs, and for moderately-sized scripts the absence of a compilation step is an advantage. Interpretive running makes it easy to write debugging code into a script and rerun it to detect and fix bugs. Non-expert users can use scripting to tailor the behavior of programs, and shell scripting provides some limited scope for multiprocessing.
On the other hand, shell scripting is prone to costly errors. Inadvertent typing errors such as rm -rf * / (instead of the intended rm -rf */) are folklore in the Unix community; a single extra space converts the command from one that deletes everything in the sub-directories to one which deletes everything - and also tries to delete everything on the root partition. Similar problems can transform cp and mv into dangerous weapons, and misuse of the > redirect can delete the contents of a file. This is made more problematic by the fact that many UNIX commands differ in name by only one letter: cp, cn, cd.
Another significant disadvantage is the slow execution speed and the need to launch a new process for almost every shell command executed. When a script's job can be accomplished by setting up a pipeline in which efficient filter commands perform most of the work, the slowdown is mitigated, but a complex script is typically several orders of magnitude slower than a conventional compiled program that performs an equivalent task.
There are also compatibility problems between different platforms. Larry Wall, creator of Perl, famously wrote that "It is easier to port a shell than a shell script."
Similarly, more complex scripts can run into the limitations of the shell scripting language itself; the limits make it difficult to write quality code and extensions by various shells to ameliorate problems with the original shell language can make problems worse. [1]
Many disadvantages of using some script languages are caused by design flaws within the language syntax or implementation, and are not necessarily imposed by the use of a text-based command line; there are a number of shells which use other shell programming languages or even full-fledged languages like Scsh (which uses Scheme).
References
See also
- Glue code
- Interpreter directive
- Shebang symbol (#!)
- Unix shells
- Windows PowerShell
- Windows Script Host
External links
| Search Wikibooks | Wikibooks has a book on the topic of |
If you like SEOmastering Site, you can support it by - BTC: bc1qppjcl3c2cyjazy6lepmrv3fh6ke9mxs7zpfky0 , TRC20 and more...
